Skip to content
Microsystems, Electronics and Acoustics
ISSN 2523-4447 · e‑ISSN 2523-4455 Open Access · CC BY-SA 4.0
Vol. 23 · Issue 4 · 2018 Aug 31, 2018 Acoustical devices and systems

Evaluation of the Quality of Music Signals Limited by the Frequency Band

MY
Mykyta Pavlovych Yurakov Corresponding Національний технічний університет України "Київський політехнічний інститут імені Ігоря Сікорського" Ukraine
IK
Igor Valeriiovych Kotvytskyi Національний технічний університет України "Київський політехнічний інститут імені Ігоря Сікорського" Ukraine
AP
Arkadiy Mykolayovych Prodeus Національний технічний університет України "Київський політехнічний інститут імені Ігоря Сікорського" Ukraine
Pages58-64 PublishedAug 31, 2018
VOL 23 · ISS 4 · 2018 View issue

Abstract

In this paper, the results of the musical signals quality assessment, with the use of objective and subjective measures, are presented. The topics covered in this paper are relevant because the growing needs of users of communication lines leading to the gradual increasing demands for bandwidth that is given to the signals. Nowadays, frequency band 300-3400 Hz (Narrow Band) in analog and mobile telephony is used. However, with the development of mobile technologies and network communications, it becomes possible to expand the bandwidth to WideBand (50-7000 Hz), Super-WideBand (50-14000 Hz) and even to Full-Band (20-20000 Hz). Such an extension of the frequency band can be explained by the desire to transmit musical signals on communication channels in a qualitative way. On the other hand, the average person may not notice the difference between two complex musical works, the spectrum of one of which extends to 20 kHz, and for another is limited to 14 kHz or even 7 kHz. Subjective music signals quality assessment was carried out by 23 students with an average age of 22 years, without hearing impairments. For objective evaluation, 4 quality measures were used, including segment signal-to-noise ratio, log-spectral distortions, bark-spectral distortions, as well as "perceptual evaluation of audio quality" measure specifically designed to evaluate the quality of music signals. The last measure is of particular interest, since the algorithm of its calculation takes into account the features of the human auditory system. The validity of the results of previous studies is confirmed, where it was stated that the frequency band of 12-14 kHz is sufficient to ensure that the musical signal is not different from the reference signal by ear. However, it should be borne in mind that the indicated result is true on average, so it is not excluded that individual listeners will assume that such a band is not wide enough for the quality reproduction of musical signals. In view of this, the results obtained in this article should be expanded, in the future, by the law of the distribution of the bandwidth limits. The examples of the "segmental signal-to-noise ratio" and “logarithmic spectral distortion” indicators demonstrated the need to take into account the peculiarities inherent in certain objective quality measures, as well as the need to provide a sufficiently large statistical volume of various musical material to obtain reliable estimates of the quality of musical signals. In particular, when using the measure "segmental signal-to-noise ratio," it is advisable to increase the sampling rate by 2-4 times, using the interpolation of the compared signals. Correspondence maps for subjective and objective measures of quality are constructed, which allows calibrating of objective estimation systems of musical signals quality. In contrast to the correlation coefficient, the use of correspondence maps suggests the existence of a nonlinear relationship between subjective and objective estimates, which contributes to improving the accuracy of the evaluation. Ref. 13, fig. 3, tabl. 2.

Keywords

References

  1. N. Cote, Integral and diagnostic intrusive prediction of speech, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, ISBN: 978-3-642-18462-8.
  2. P. Luisou, Speech enhancement. Theory and practice. Second edition, CRC Press, 2013, ISBN: 978-1-4665-0422-6
  3. P. Pocta, J. Beerends, “Subjective and objective assessment of perceived audio quality of current digital audio broadcasting systems and web-casting applications,” IEEE Transactions on broadcasting, vol. 61, no. 3, september 2015, pp. 407–415, DOI: 10.1109/TBC.2015.2424373
  4. K. Brandenburg, “MP3 and AAC explained,” AES 17th International Conference on High Quality Audio Coding, Signa, Italy, September, 1999
  5. I. Kotvytskyi, A. Osa, “Obєktivne ta sub’єktivne ocіnyuvannya yakostі muzichnih signalіv obmejenih smugoyu chastot [Objective and subjective quality assessment of music signals limited by bandwidth],” Electronic and acoustic engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34-38, 2017. URL: http://feltran.kpi.ua/article/view/109415 .
  6. D. Campbell, E. Jones, M. Glavin, “Audio quality assessment techniques ‑ A review, and recent developments,” Signal Processing, 89, pp.1489–1500, 2009, ISSN: 0165-1684.
  7. Telecommunications & Signal Processing Laboratory, Multimedia Signal Processing. Perceptual Evaluation of Audio Quality (PEAQ). http://www-mmsp.ece.mcgill.ca/MMSP/Documents/Downloads/PQevalAudio/PQevalAudio-v1r0.tar.gz
  8. P. Kabal, An Examination and Interpretation of ITU-R BS.1387: Perceptual Evaluation of Audio Quality. TSP Lab Technical Report, Dept. ECE, McGill Univ. May, 2002.
  9. D. Câmpeanu and A. Câmpeanu, PEAQ – an objective method to assess the perceptual quality of audio compressed files URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228944316 .
  10. M. Salovarda, I. Bolkovac, and H. Domitrovic, Comparsion of audio codecs using PEAQ algorithm, URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267774023_Comparison_of_audio_codecs_using_PEAQ_algorithm
  11. A.N. Prodeus, V.S. Didkovskyi, and M.V. Didkovskaya, Akusticheskaya ekspertiza i korrekciya kommunikacionnyh kanalov. [Acoustic examination and correction of communication channels. Monograph], Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, OmniScriptum GmbH & Co. KG, 2017. ISBN: 978-3-330-04591-0.
  12. A. Prodeus, “Reducing Sensitivity of Segmental Signal-to-Noise Ratio Estimator to Time-Alignment Error” Int. J. Electr. Electron. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 31–36, 2015. URL: http://www.aascit.org/journal/archive2?journalId=915&paperId=2822 .
  13. A. Prodeus, “On Some Features of Log-Spectral Distortion as Speech Quality Measure,” Autom. Softw. Dev. Eng. J., vol. 1, 2016. URL: https://asdej.xyz/asde-journal-vol-1/
§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues

Experimental Study of the Frequency Characteristics of MEMS Microphones for Railway Noise Monitoring

Vitalii R. Prus, PhD, Assoc. Prof. Oleksii Viktorovych Bogdanov

Abstract–The paper presents the results of an experimental study of the acoustic characteristics of modular MEMS microphones INMP441 and SPH0645, aimed at their…

#acoustic monitoring #MEMS microphone #amplitude-frequency response #directivity pattern
p. 359669.1-359669.6
10.20535/2523-4455.mea.359669

Similar Articles

1-10 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.