Skip to content
Microsystems, Electronics and Acoustics
ISSN 2523-4447 · e‑ISSN 2523-4455 Open Access · CC BY-SA 4.0
Vol. 31 · Issue 2 · 2026 Jun 16, 2026 Acoustical devices and systems

Practical Method of Estimating Safe Sounds for a Person with PTSD

AP
Anastasiia Volodymyrivna Pareniuk National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Ukraine
DP
PhD Dmytro Volodymyrovych Pareniuk Corresponding National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Ukraine
KR
PhD, Researcher Kateryna L. Rudenka State Institution “O. S. Kolomiychenko Institute of Otolaryngology of National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine” Ukraine
Pages359648.1-359648.12 PublishedJun 16, 2026 LicenseOpen Access
VOL 31 · ISS 2 · 2026 View issue

Abstract

Purpose. The study is intended to explore the usability and effectiveness of the acoustic environment safety estimation method in relation to potentially triggering stimuli for people with post-traumatic stress disorder. The proposed method merges power spectral density (PSD) and mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) feature extraction with statistical testing and lightweight machine-learning classification and aims to minimize distress responses to salient sound events. The method is designed for portable embedded platforms with optional cloud-side analytics, ensuring analysis efficiency while allowing application by technical and medical personnel within a structured acquisition protocol. Material & Methods. Captured audio recordings were grouped into three categories: non-harmful everyday sounds, harm-related (danger-associated) acoustic stimuli relevant to populated environments and elevated threat salience. The signals were analyzed using Welch-based PSD across 20 Hz–20 kHz (100 Hz bands; Hamming window) and MFCC features (13 cepstral coefficients plus log frame energy). Aggregated feature vectors were computed for each file. The observed data points were divided into three groups of 252 each (N = 756 total). To assess normality, in addition to graphical review, the Shapiro–Wilk test (null hypothesis rejected when p < 0.05) and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (null hypothesis rejected when p < 0.20) were used. Parametric (Student’s t) or nonparametric (Mann–Whitney U) pairwise procedures were applied where appropriate. To evaluate differences across the groups, an omnibus Kruskal–Wallis test was used. Classification experiments employed two-layer neural networks, with 10% of the data used for testing. Results. The difference was statistically significant between the three groups of signals for the aggregated PSD- and MFCC-derived descriptors as a result of the proposed method implementation. The use of selected parametric tests, rank-based methods, and conditional nonparametric comparisons was justified by the non-normal distribution of per-file results for both feature families under the study’s testing framework. As illustrated by the study’s compliance matrices for PSD and MFCC inputs, a neural network based on engineered features generated classification consistent with those suggested by spectral and cepstral summaries. Conclusion. The proposed method is internally consistent within the conducted statistical analysis framework for the three-group setup and demonstrates the ability to differentiate between the analyzed acoustic contexts. Moreover, it provides easy implementation within a portable measurement concept and higher analysis speed compared to manual waveforms review. Additionally, integration of audio descriptors with formal hypothesis testing and learned models offers a reliable practical foundation for further testing on independent cohorts and hardware prototype development.

Keywords

References

  1. T. F. Quatieri, “An Emotion-Driven Vocal Biomarker-Based PTSD Screening Tool”, IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, vol. 5, pp. 621–626, Jan. 2024. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3284798.
  2. B. J. de Jesus, M. K. S. Lopes, L. Perreault, M.-C. Roberge, A. A. Oliveira, and T. H. Falk, “Instrumenting a Virtual Reality Headset to Monitor Changes in Electroencephalograms of PTSD Patients During Multisensory Immersion”, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Sensors, vol. 2, pp. 150–161, Jan. 2025. doi: 10.1109/JSAS.2025.3554131.
  3. M. N. Shahzad, H. Ali, T. Saba, A. Rehman, H. Kolivand, and S. A. Bahaj, “Identifying Patients With PTSD Utilizing Resting-State fMRI Data and Neural Network Approach”, IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 107941–107954, Jan. 2021. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3098453
  4. K. Kaur, A. Asnaani, H. C. Levy, M. L. Miller, D. F. Tolin, and C. P. McLean, “Moving beyond symptom reduction: A meta‐analysis on the effect of exposure therapy for PTSD on quality of life”, Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 80, no. 10, pp. 2134–2146, Jun. 2024. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23727
  5. Post-traumatic stress disorder. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/post-traumatic-stress-disorder
  6. Ukraine Conflict Monitor | ACLED’. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://acleddata.com/monitor/ukraine-conflict-monitor
  7. Ukraine: Situation Report, August 2025 [EN/UK] | OCHA’. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.unocha.org/publications/report/ukraine/ukraine-situation-report-august-2025
  8. Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict — March 2026. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ukraine.ohchr.org/en/Protection-of-Civilians-in-Armed-Conflict-March-2026
  9. O. Lushchak, M. Velykodna, S. Bolman, O. Strilbytska, V. Berezovskyi, and K. B. Storey, “Prevalence of stress, anxiety, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder among Ukrainians after the first year of Russian invasion: a nationwide cross-sectional study”, The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, vol. 36, p. 100773, Jan. 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100773.
  10. I. Pinchuk, Y. Yachnik, R. Goto, and N. Skokauskas, “Mental health services during the war in Ukraine: 2-years follow up study”, International Journal of Mental Health Systems, vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 2025. doi: 10.1186/s13033-025-00667-9.
  11. K. J. Ressler, “Post-traumatic stress disorder: clinical and translational neuroscience from cells to circuits”, Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 273–288, Mar. 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41582-022-00635-8.
  12. R. E. Kaul, “Mary Beth Williams and Soili Poijula. The PTSD Workbook: Simple, Effective Techniques for Overcoming Traumatic Stress Symptoms. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc., 2002. 237 pp. ISBN 1‐57224‐282‐5, $17.95 (paper)”, Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 373–376, Dec. 2002. doi: 10.1093/brief-treatment/2.4.373.
  13. O. E. Omopo, “Exploring Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Causes, Diagnostic Criteria, and Treatment Options”, International Journal of Academic Information Systems Research (IJAISR), vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 35–44, Jan. 2024. URL: http://ijeais.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/7/IJAISR240705.pdf
  14. A. P. Siddaway, “Flashbacks uniquely characterise post-traumatic stress disorder: distinguishing flashbacks from other psychological processes and phenomena”, BJPsych Advances, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 207–208, Feb. 2025. doi: 10.1192/bja.2025.3.
  15. J. D. Bremner, “Traumatic stress: effects on the brain”, Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 445–461, Dec. 2006. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2006.8.4/jbremner.
  16. K. A. Glad, T. K. Jensen, G. S. Hafstad, and G. Dyb, “Posttraumatic stress disorder and exposure to trauma reminders after a terrorist attack”, Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 435–447, Dec. 2015., doi: 10.1080/15299732.2015.1126777.
  17. Y. Li, “Predicting PTSD symptoms in firefighters using a fear-potentiated startle paradigm and machine learning”, Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 319, pp. 294–299, Dec. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.094.
  18. D. Kozarić-Kovačić, A. Jambrošić-Sakoman, and T. Jovanovic, “Startle reactivity in acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder”., Stud Health Technol Inform, vol. 167, pp. 194–198, Jan. 2011. PMID: 21685666. doi: 10.3233/978-1-60750-766-6-194
  19. C. Eichfeld, “Trauma Stabilisation as a Sole Treatment Intervention for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Southeast Asia”, Psychiatric Quarterly, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 63–88, Sep. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9598-z.
  20. C. L. Badour, D. M. Blonigen, M. T. Boden, M. T. Feldner, and M. O. Bonn-Miller, “A longitudinal test of the bi-directional relations between avoidance coping and PTSD severity during and after PTSD treatment”, Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 610–616, Oct. 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.06.006.
  21. ‘Microphone Amplifier with AGC and Low-Noise Microphone Bias’, https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/ .
  22. ‘The Internet of Things with ESP32’. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2026. [Online]. Available: http://esp32.net/
  23. D. V. Pareniuk, “Frequency measurement using non-specialized commercial hardware and software [Chastotometriya iz vykorystannyam nespetsializovanoho komertsiynoho aparatnoho ta prohramnoho zabezpechennya]”, in Proceedings of XV International Scientific and Practical Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2022, pp. 157–162. URL: https://sci-conf.com.ua/xv-mizhnarodna-naukovo-praktichna-konferentsiya-modern-scientific-research-achievements-innovations-and-development-prospects-14-16-08-2022-berlin-nimechchina-arhiv/
  24. ‘Power Spectral Density’. Accessed: Apr. 25, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter10/10_2_1_power_spectral_density.php
  25. A. V. Pareniuk and D. V. Pareniuk, “Estimation of Acting Factor in Stress from Motorbike Sounds”, Microsystems, Electronics and Acoustics, vol. 29, no. 2, Jul. 2024. doi: 10.20535/2523-4455.mea.303514.
  26. A. V. Pareniuk, D. V. Pareniuk, and K. L. Rudenka, “Graphical Method of Effectively Estimation of Hearing Organ Rehabilitation”, Microsystems, Electronics and Acoustics, vol. 30, no. 3, Dec. 2025. doi: 10.20535/2523-4455.mea.340703.
  27. D. G. Altman and J. M. Bland, “Parametric v non-parametric methods for data analysis”, BMJ, vol. 338, no. apr02 1, pp. a3167-a3167, Apr. 2009. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a3167.
  28. P. Sedgwick, “A comparison of parametric and non-parametric statistical tests”, BMJ, vol. 350, no. apr17 1, pp. h2053-h2053, Apr. 2015. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2053.
  29. A. Nabou, M. driss Laanaoui, M. Ouzzif, and M. A. E. houssaini, 02-Jun.-2021. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-473896/v1.
  30. Causeweb, "Power Comparisons of the Mann-Whitney U and Permutation Tests". [Online]. Available: https://www.causeweb.org/usproc/sites/default/files/usclap/2016/Final Project.pdf
  31. C. Schulte, M. Harrer, C. Sachser, J. Weiss, and A.-C. Zarski, “Internet- and mobile-based psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress symptoms in youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis”, npj Digital Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, Feb. 2024. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01042-7.
  32. C. McLean, C. A. Davis, M. Miller, J. Ruzek, and E. Neri, “The Effects of an Exposure-Based Mobile App on Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Veterans: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial”, JMIR mHealth and uHealth, vol. 10, no. 11, p. e38951, Nov. 2022. doi: 10.2196/38951.
  33. M. Bandara, R. Jayasundara, I. Ariyarathne, D. Meedeniya, and C. Perera, ‘Forest Sound Classification Dataset: FSC22’, Sensors, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 2032, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23042032.
  34. C. V. F. Pereira, E. M. de Oliveira, and A. D. de Souza, “Machine Learning Applied to Edge Computing and Wearable Devices for Healthcare: Systematic Mapping of the Literature”, Sensors, vol. 24, no. 19, p. 6322, Sep. 2024. doi: 10.3390/s24196322.

License

CCBY-SA 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues

Experimental Study of the Frequency Characteristics of MEMS Microphones for Railway Noise Monitoring

Vitalii R. Prus, PhD, Assoc. Prof. Oleksii Viktorovych Bogdanov

Abstract–The paper presents the results of an experimental study of the acoustic characteristics of modular MEMS microphones INMP441 and SPH0645, aimed at their…

#acoustic monitoring #MEMS microphone #amplitude-frequency response #directivity pattern
p. 359669.1-359669.6
10.20535/2523-4455.mea.359669

Acoustic Localization of Aerial Objects and Practical Evaluation of its Accuracy

Dr.Sc.(Eng.), Prof. Serhii Anatoliiovych Naida, Dr.Sc.(Eng.), Assoc. Prof. Oleksandr Ivanovych Drozdenko, PhD, Assoc. Prof. Pavlo Vasyliovych Popovych, канд. техн. наук, доц. Катерина Сергіївна Дрозденко, PhD Oleksandr Ihorovych Nyzhnyk, PhD Yaroslav Ivanovych Starovoit

The active use of aerial objects creates a need for passive detection methods. This paper presents an experimental study of an automated acoustic hardware and software…

#acoustic signal processing #sound source localization #microphone arrays #beamforming
p. 359830.1-359830.7
10.20535/2523-4455.mea.359830

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 69

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.