Skip to content
POWER ENGINEERING: economics, technique, ecology
ISSN 1813-5420 · e‑ISSN 2308-7382 Open Access · CC BY 4.0
Vol. · Issue 3 · 2026 Oct 12, 2026 LIBERALIZED MARKETS OF ENERGY

THE IMPACT OF CRISIS MARKET CONDITIONS ON THE LEVELISED COST OF HYDROGEN

BM
Bogdan Maksymenko Corresponding National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute», Ukraine
SS
Sergii Shman National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine
Pages179-187 PublishedOct 12, 2026 LicenseOpen Access
PDF (Ukrainian)
VOL · ISS 3 · 2026 85 View issue

Abstract

The study establishes the effect of crisis conditions in the electricity market on the cost of hydrogen produced by electrolysis. A grid-connected hydrogen hub is considered: a solar power plant, optionally complemented by wind, with an electrolyser supplied by own generation and the grid.

Calculations are performed hour by hour, using actual day-ahead market prices. Three price years are used for Ukraine (2021, 2023, 2025) and three for the Germany-Luxembourg market zone, DE-LU (2020, 2022, 2025). These years are classified as calm or crisis: the 2022 European energy crisis and the wartime years in Ukraine (2023 and 2025).

For the base configuration (a 32 MW electrolyser with 64 MW of solar), moving from a calm to a crisis price year raises the cost of hydrogen by 46% in Ukraine and by a factor of 2.7 in the DE-LU zone, whereas replacing the climate site under unchanged prices changes it by only a few percent.

The impact of a crisis is proportional to its duration: one to three crisis years reduce the overall project result by only 7–31% of the gap between the calm and crisis scenarios, while the project as a whole remains profitable; it is the hydrogen chain, not the project, that falls below break-even under crisis prices. The Ukrainian transmission tariff adds a further 6–8% to the cost of hydrogen, and the effect grows with the tariff itself. Crisis prices do not halt the project but change its operating mode: average electrolyser utilisation falls from 93.1% in the calm year 2021 to 43.5% in the crisis year 2025 in Ukraine, and to 18.0% in DE-LU 2022.

The results provide a quantitative basis for risk assessment when planning grid-connected hydrogen hubs under unstable market conditions.

Keywords

#hydrogen #hydrogen hub #energy crisis #electricity price #levelised cost of hydrogen #electrolyser #day-ahead market

References

  1. Glenk G., Reichelstein S. Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen. Nature Energy. 2019. Vol. 4, No. 3. P. 216–222. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-019-0326-1.
  2. van Leeuwen C., Mulder M. Power-to-gas in electricity markets dominated by renewables. Applied Energy. 2018. Vol. 232. P. 258–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.217.
  3. Sayed-Ahmed H. et al. Strategies and challenges for reducing green hydrogen cost: Operation mode and revenue streams. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2025. Vol. 223. Art. 116065. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.116065.
  4. Aminaho E. N., Aminaho N. S., Aminaho F. Techno-economic assessments of electrolyzers for hydrogen production. Applied Energy. 2025. Vol. 399. Art. 126515. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126515.
  5. Schmidt O. et al. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017. Vol. 42, No. 52. P. 30470–30492. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045.
  6. Terlouw T., Bauer C., McKenna R., Mazzotti M. Large-scale hydrogen production via water electrolysis: a techno-economic and environmental assessment. Energy & Environmental Science. 2022. Vol. 15, No. 9. P. 3583–3602. DOI: 10.1039/D2EE01023B.
  7. Reksten A. H., Thomassen M. S., Møller-Holst S., Sundseth K. Projecting the future cost of PEM and alkaline water electrolysers; a CAPEX model including electrolyser plant size and technology development. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2022. Vol. 47, No. 90. P. 38106–38113. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.306.
  8. Morgan E. R., Manwell J. F., McGowan J. G. Opportunities for economies of scale with alkaline electrolyzers. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2013. Vol. 38, No. 36. P. 15903–15909. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.08.116.
  9. Rey J., Delgado C., Segura F., Andújar J. M. Modularisation Analysis for Scaling Hydrogen Production: High-Power Single-Electrolyser vs. Multiple-Smaller-Electrolyser Plants. Hydrogen. 2026. Vol. 7, No. 1. Art. 4. DOI: 10.3390/hydrogen7010004.
  10. Hofrichter A., Rank D., Heberl M., Sterner M. Determination of the optimal power ratio between electrolysis and renewable energy to investigate the effects on the hydrogen production costs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023. Vol. 48, No. 5. P. 1651–1663. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.263.
  11. Brandt J. et al. Cost and competitiveness of green hydrogen and the effects of the European Union regulatory framework. Nature Energy. 2024. Vol. 9, No. 6. P. 703–713. DOI: 10.1038/s41560-024-01511-z.
  12. Ruhnau O., Schiele J. Flexible green hydrogen: The effect of relaxing simultaneity requirements on project design, economics, and power sector emissions. Energy Policy. 2023. Vol. 182. Art. 113763. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113763.
  13. Marocco P., Gandiglio M., Santarelli M. Optimal design of PV-based grid-connected hydrogen production systems. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024. Vol. 434. Art. 140007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140007.
  14. Ibagon N., Muñoz P., Correa G. Techno economic analysis tool for the sizing and optimization of an on-grid hydrogen hub: A case study for energy transition in Argentina. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024. Vol. 65. P. 659–670. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.007.
  15. Eisele P., Olofsson A., Castro R. Profitability vs. emission intensity: Electrolysis strategies in Germany's evolving hydrogen market. Energy. 2026. Vol. 348. Art. 140508. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140508.
  16. Hu H. et al. Triple-level cost-effective sizing optimization for solar-powered hybrid hydrogen system with PEM and alkaline electrolyzers. Energy. 2025. Vol. 334. Art. 137647. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.137647.
  17. Li S., Tong L., Mount T., Upadhyay K., Eisenhardt H., Kumar P. Renewable-Colocated Green Hydrogen Production: Optimal Scheduling and Profitability. arXiv preprint. 2025. arXiv:2504.18368. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.18368.
  18. Zhu P., Mae M., Matsuhashi R. Techno-Economic Analysis of Grid-Connected Hydrogen Production via Water Electrolysis. Energies. 2024. Vol. 17, No. 7. Art. 1653. DOI: 10.3390/en17071653.
  19. NASA Langley Research Center. POWER: Prediction of Worldwide Energy Resources – hourly meteorological and solar data. URL: https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/ (дата звернення: 10.08.2026).
  20. Perez R. et al. Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy. 1990. Vol. 44, No. 5. P. 271–289. DOI: 10.1016/0038-092X(90)90055-H.
  21. ДП «Оператор ринку». Результати торгів на ринку «на добу наперед»: погодинні ціни та обсяги. URL: https://www.oree.com.ua/ (дата звернення: 10.08.2026).
  22. Fraunhofer ISE. Energy-Charts: day-ahead spot market prices, bidding zone DE-LU. URL: https://www.energy-charts.info (дата звернення: 10.08.2026).
  23. Про встановлення тарифу на послуги з передачі електричної енергії: постанова НКРЕКП від 19.12.2024 № 2200 (тариф 2025 року); постанова НКРЕКП від 09.12.2020 № 2353 (тариф 2021 року); тариф 2023 року – середньозважена трьох тарифних періодів за даними НКРЕКП. URL: https://www.nerc.gov.ua/sferi-diyalnosti/elektroenergiya/promislovist/tarifi-na-elektroenergiyu-dlya-nepobutovih-spozhivachiv/tarif-na-poslugi-z-peredachi-elektrichnoyi-energiyi (дата звернення: 10.08.2026).
  24. Gesetz über die Elektrizitäts- und Gasversorgung (Energiewirtschaftsgesetz – EnWG), § 118 Abs. 6. URL: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/enwg_2005/__118.html (дата звернення: 10.08.2026).
  25. International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2024. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, 2025. URL: https://www.irena.org/Publications/2025/Jun/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in-2024 (дата звернення: 10.08.2026).
  26. European Hydrogen Observatory. The European hydrogen market landscape. November 2024. URL: https://observatory.clean-hydrogen.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-11/The%20European%20hydrogen%20market%20landscape_November%202024.pdf (дата звернення: 10.08.2026).

License

CCBY 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

This work is openly licensed — share and adapt freely with attribution to the authors and the journal. View license terms ↗

Copyright (c) 2026 Bogdan Maksymenko, Sergii Shman

§ 06 — Related

Similar articles in this journal

Related peer-reviewed studies published in this journal.
View all issues

IMPROVEMENT OF METHODS OF DISTRIBUTION NETWORK TOPOLOGY MANAGEMENT

Vladimir Popov, Olena Yarmoliuk, Vadym Tkachenko, Vladyslav Natalych, Denys Beregovyi

The article considers the issues of increasing the effectiveness of solving the most widespread and relevant for electric power distribution systems problem of…

#distribution networks #alternative energy sources #distributed generation #dynamic control of modes of operation
p. 18-27
10.20535/1813-5420.3.2026.365104