DevOps – концепт і структурне представлення

Павло Маслянко; Іван Савчук

doi:10.20535/kpisn.2021.4.261938

Vol. · Issue 4 · 2021 Jun 1, 2020 article

DevOps – concept and structural representation

Pavlo Maslianko Corresponding Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine Ukraine

Ivan Savchuk Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine Ukraine

PublishedJun 1, 2020

PDF (Ukrainian)

KPISN 4 VOL · 4

VOL · ISS 4 · 2021 View issue

Abstract

Problems. Today, along with a huge number of methods, technologies and means of improving business efficiency, the concept of DevOps (Development & Operations) is also gaining rapid development. In particular, the application of the DevOps concept in business leads practitioners to the question of the feasibility of application, formalization of this process, and usually the development of their own DevOps system focused on achieving the specified values of the metrics of the organizational structure. Research goal and objectives. The purpose of this article is to study the essence, concept and definition of the DevOps concept, define the entities of the DevOps concept and formalize the unified DevOps model. Methods of research. Methodology of comparative analysis of scientific results and engineering practices of DevOps implementation, systematization of entity classes of the DevOps concept in the form of a Venn diagram, graphic modeling of a unified DevOps model. Research results. The practical value and effectiveness of DevOps implementation, the lack of theoretical research and justification of DevOps systems engineering methods, apart from examples of individual patterns and individual architectural solutions of DevOps for the IT industry, have been established. The article substantiates and proposes a structural representation of the DevOps concept in the form of a Venn diagram as a system of entities of production, support, management of production and support processes, and relationships between them. These results make it possible to choose theoretical and applied tools for the formalization of a unified model of DevOps systems. Conclusions. The unified model of the DevOps system in the form of a diagram of components and formalized specifications of the interfaces between these components and the unified model of the DevOps system in the form of a diagram of the activities of these components make it possible to proceed to the development of well-founded engineering methods of DevOps systems.

Keywords

#competitive advantage #collaboration #software product management #DevOps processes #DevOps metrics #DevOps concept #DevOps system engineering #DevOps model #DevOps

References

M. Senapathi, J. Buchan, H. Osman, “DevOps capabilities, practices, and challenges: Insights from a case study”, in Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Eval. Assess. Software Eng., 2018.
P. Jha, R. Khan, “A review paper on DevOps: Beginning and more to know”, Int. J. Comp. Applic., vol. 180, no. 48, pp. 16–20, 2018. doi: 10.5120/ijca2018917253
DevOps 101 with Atlassian [Online]. Available: https://www.atlassian.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/devops-101-atlassian.pdf
“Competitive Advantage through DevOps”, Harvard Business Review Analytyc Service, Res. Rep., 2019.
“2021 Puppet State of DevOps”, CircleCI, Report, 2021.
P. Haindl, R. Plösch, “Focus areas, themes, and objectives of non-functional requirements in DevOps: A systematic mapping study”, in 46th Euromicro Conf. Software Eng. Advanc. Applic., Portoroz, Slovenia, pp. 394–403, 2020. doi: 10.1109/SEAA51224.2020.00071
C. Scoular, D. Duckworth, J. Heard, D. Ramalingam, “Collaboration: Definition and structure”, The Australian Council for Educational Research, report, 2020.
M.L. Pedra, M.F. Silva, L.G. Azevedo, “DevOps adoption: Eight emergent perspectives”, ArXiv abs/2109.09601, 2021.
D. López-fernández, J. Díaz, J.G. Martín, J.E. Pérez, Á. González-Prieto, “DevOps team structures: Characterization and implications”, ArXiv abs/2101.02361, 2021.
M. Gokarna, R. Singh, “DevOps: A historical review and future works”, in Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Comp. Commun. Intell. Syst., Greater Noida, India, pp. 366–371, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ICCCIS51004.2021.9397235
K. Maroukian, S.R. Gulliver, “Leading DevOps practice and principle adoption”, ArXiv abs/2008.10515, 2020.
N. Bhuiyan, “A framework for successful new product development”, J. Indust. Eng. Manag., vol. 4, no. 4, 2011. doi: 10.3926/jiem.334.
R.G. Oliveira, “Lean and performance measuring – Developing a new performance measurement framework to fit lean”, M.S. thesis, Universidade de Porto, 2018.
M. Sallin, M. Kropp, C. Anslow, J.W. Quilty, A. Meier, “Measuring software delivery performance using the four key metrics of DevOps”, in Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 419, P. Gregory, C. Lassenius, X. Wang, P. Kruchten, eds. Cham: Springer, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78098-2_7
R. Pietrantuono, A. Bertolino, G.D. Angelis, B. Miranda, S. Russo, “Towards continuous software reliability testing in DevOps”, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 14th Int. Workshop on Automation of Software Test, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2019. doi: 10.1109/AST.2019.00009
“What is DevOps?” [Online]: Available: https://www.atlassian.com/devops
A. Kosyakov, S.M. Beamer, S.J. Seymour, W.N. Sweet, Systems Engineering. Principles and Practice. Moscow, Russia: DMK Press, 2014, 624 p.
D.K. Hitchins, Systems Engineering. A 21st Century Systems Methodology. Wiley, 2007, 528 p.

Previous in issue Finite approximation of zero-sum games played in staircase-function continuous spaces Next in issue Prerequisites for using the system-morphological approach and fractal theory in the creation of vices for complex shape objects

§ 06 — Related

[1] M. Senapathi, J. Buchan, H. Osman, “DevOps capabilities, practices, and challenges: Insights from a case study”, in Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. Eval. Assess. Software Eng., 2018.

[2] P. Jha, R. Khan, “A review paper on DevOps: Beginning and more to know”, Int. J. Comp. Applic., vol. 180, no. 48, pp. 16–20, 2018. doi: 10.5120/ijca2018917253

[3] DevOps 101 with Atlassian [Online]. Available: https://www.atlassian.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/devops-101-atlassian.pdf

[4] “Competitive Advantage through DevOps”, Harvard Business Review Analytyc Service, Res. Rep., 2019.

[5] “2021 Puppet State of DevOps”, CircleCI, Report, 2021.

[6] P. Haindl, R. Plösch, “Focus areas, themes, and objectives of non-functional requirements in DevOps: A systematic mapping study”, in 46th Euromicro Conf. Software Eng. Advanc. Applic., Portoroz, Slovenia, pp. 394–403, 2020. doi: 10.1109/SEAA51224.2020.00071

[7] C. Scoular, D. Duckworth, J. Heard, D. Ramalingam, “Collaboration: Definition and structure”, The Australian Council for Educational Research, report, 2020.

[8] M.L. Pedra, M.F. Silva, L.G. Azevedo, “DevOps adoption: Eight emergent perspectives”, ArXiv abs/2109.09601, 2021.

[9] D. López-fernández, J. Díaz, J.G. Martín, J.E. Pérez, Á. González-Prieto, “DevOps team structures: Characterization and implications”, ArXiv abs/2101.02361, 2021.

[10] M. Gokarna, R. Singh, “DevOps: A historical review and future works”, in Proc. 2021 Int. Conf. Comp. Commun. Intell. Syst., Greater Noida, India, pp. 366–371, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ICCCIS51004.2021.9397235

[11] K. Maroukian, S.R. Gulliver, “Leading DevOps practice and principle adoption”, ArXiv abs/2008.10515, 2020.

[12] N. Bhuiyan, “A framework for successful new product development”, J. Indust. Eng. Manag., vol. 4, no. 4, 2011. doi: 10.3926/jiem.334.

[13] R.G. Oliveira, “Lean and performance measuring – Developing a new performance measurement framework to fit lean”, M.S. thesis, Universidade de Porto, 2018.

[14] M. Sallin, M. Kropp, C. Anslow, J.W. Quilty, A. Meier, “Measuring software delivery performance using the four key metrics of DevOps”, in Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 419, P. Gregory, C. Lassenius, X. Wang, P. Kruchten, eds. Cham: Springer, 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-78098-2_7

[15] R. Pietrantuono, A. Bertolino, G.D. Angelis, B. Miranda, S. Russo, “Towards continuous software reliability testing in DevOps”, in 2019 IEEE/ACM 14th Int. Workshop on Automation of Software Test, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2019. doi: 10.1109/AST.2019.00009

[16] “What is DevOps?” [Online]: Available: https://www.atlassian.com/devops

[17] A. Kosyakov, S.M. Beamer, S.J. Seymour, W.N. Sweet, Systems Engineering. Principles and Practice. Moscow, Russia: DMK Press, 2014, 624 p.

[18] D.K. Hitchins, Systems Engineering. A 21st Century Systems Methodology. Wiley, 2007, 528 p.

DevOps – concept and structural representation

Abstract

Keywords

References

Similar articles in this journal

DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR FORMALIZING DYNAMIC THERMAL PORTRAITS FOR ROBUST TARGET DETECTION

AN APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTING AN INFORMATIVE FEATURE SPACE OF TECHNICAL INDICATORS FOR FINANCIAL PROCESSES BASED ON NEURAL NETWORK MODELS

METHODS FOR ENSURING THE INTEGRITY OF DATA PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION IN INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION SYSTEMS

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

Similar Articles

SIMULATION MODEL OF A DIGITAL TWIN FOR AN NPP POWER UNIT TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESS

MACHINE LEARNING MODEL FOR RECOGNITION OF UKRAINIAN SIGN LANGUAGE HAND CONFIGURATIONS

MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE AND ALGORITHMS OF A MODULAR AUTOMATION SYSTEM FOR SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGICAL PROCESSES

AUTONOMOUS INDEX RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM FOR RELATIONAL DATABASES BASED ON COST-MODEL AND PLAN COVERING

METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING THE TRANSMISSION PATH STRUCTURE IN FUSION POWER PLANTS

GENERALIZATION OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STRUCTURE FOR FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT

3D MODELING OF NITRIC ACID PRODUCTION

COMBINED APPROACH TO SIMULATION MODELING OF THE DYNAMICS OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS BASED ON INTERPRETATIONS OF PETRI NETS

EXPERIMENTAL PRODUCTION AND MODELING OF FINNED TUBES FORMATION BY FREEZING IN THE FORM WITH DISCRETE THERMAL INSULATION

AN APPROACH TO CONSTRUCTING AN INFORMATIVE FEATURE SPACE OF TECHNICAL INDICATORS FOR FINANCIAL PROCESSES BASED ON NEURAL NETWORK MODELS